11 Comments
User's avatar
Anny Soumo's avatar

Audrey Truschke is an academic whore and a pathological liar. She is a fraudster. She is a stupid worthless white parasite.

It is high time Indians ceased to allow or listen to her kind, peddling the academic equivalent of white supremacist lies. We should see her for the pile of pig excrement that she and her ilk are. White people have NO standing when Indians understand the truth of their history, culture, religion and heritage. There have been hundreds of years of them perfecting their lies and distortions, and Indians supporting her ilk should be seen as traitors. Virtually all of Western Academia, and certainly all of USA academia is a propaganda outfit, sold to the highest bidder, they have always thought their lies will last. Enough is enough.

She has all the traits of a narcissistic sociopath. She attacks Indian heritage with her catalogue of lies and fabrications, purely for a racist white supremacist agenda.

Her University, Rutgers, is bribed by Qatar to the tune of millions to fabricate evidence to harm and distort Indian history. She is a plagiarist and her writing are nothing more than a work of fiction. Her Bible bashing family of Christian scoundrels are some of the biggest con artists and fraudsters going.

Her family runs a Christian conversion racket, spreading Abrahamic lies, she serves her fake God who is the devil.

Audrey Truschke comes from a Christian Evangelical family, with both her husband and father-in-law serving as pastors. The usual American European white Christian pedophiles. She has three children.

nearby's avatar

She become famous thanks to idiots on raita wing. They claim chankya but never practice him....left write a book, raita wing protest make them famous, some from non left write books cou tearing left left go silence.... No noise possible few academic noise...

Anshikamax's avatar

I absolutely, Mecca represents a strict, uncompromising monotheism that strictly forbids the idol-worship, polytheism, and nature-veneration that characterised the ancient Indus Valley. Philosophically, the two worldviews are fundamentally at odds. To claim Mecca as your ultimate spiritual anchor while claiming Mohenjo-Daro as your cultural anchor creates an undeniable intellectual friction (yk for whom). And some people still cope by putting counter argument of [Genetic and Lineal Continuity] key, "genetic continuity" argument completely collapses under the weight of real-world human psychology and state policy.

Biological DNA means absolutely nothing if the cultural memory has been systematically lobotomized. You cannot spend over half a century teaching a population to despise a specific culture, only to turn around and claim to be the proud custodians of that culture's cradle.

At the end Pakistani cannot reconcile loving the soil of Mohenjo-Daro with hating the soul of its traditions, the space naturally devolves into defensive vitriol and anti-Hindu tribalism.

Mrushad Khombhadia's avatar

However hard you try,you can’t hide or escape from your Hindu/Indic identify.

Islam is not from this land.

Faizan J. Imam's avatar

This whole argument rests on a convenient confusion between religion, geography, ancestry, and the modern nation-state, and the confusion isn't accidental.

Pakistan did not fall from the sky in 1947. The state is modern but the land is ancient. The people of Sindh, Punjab, Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and the wider Indus basin did not forfeit their ancestral inheritance because many of their forefathers became Muslim. Conversion changes faith. It does not erase ancestry, soil, language, food, music, or the civilisational record sitting beneath your feet.

Consider the logic being applied here. Modern Iraqis have no claim to Mesopotamia because Iraq wasn't called Iraq in Sumerian times. Egyptians have no claim to the Nile civilisation because Egypt passed through Pharaonic, Christian and Islamic phases. Chinese people have no claim to the Yellow River civilisation because the modern state isn't the ancient polity. Nobody actually believes this. Lands change names. Religions change. Populations stay rooted in place even as their identities shift across centuries.

Here's where it gets embarrassing. The name "India" comes through the Indus/Sindhu world and the Indus is not a Gangetic river. Mohenjo-daro is in Sindh, Harappa is in Punjab, Mehergarh is in Balochistan and Rehman Dehri is in KPK. The river, the valley, the urban core and most of the archaeological record being claimed all sit west of the current Indian border. You cannot argue "civilisational inheritance" and simultaneously treat Pakistanis as trespassers on their own ancestral ground.

The "Mecca versus Mohenjo-daro" line is rhetorically satisfying and analytically worthless. A Muslim in Pakistan can face Mecca in prayer and still inherit the Indus through ancestry, language, region and history. One does not cancel the other. Iraqi Muslims remain heirs to Mesopotamia. Egyptian Muslims remain heirs to the Nile. Pakistani Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and Christians don't stop being heirs to the Indus because someone needs the argument to be tidier than it actually is.

The "Indus-Saraswati" rebranding is doing obvious political work. Even granting a Ghaggar-Hakra association, that doesn't erase the Indus or hand the civilisation over as exclusive property of the modern Indian state. Sapta Sindhu still points back to the riverine world of the northwest. A contested river thesis cannot overwrite the actual river the civilisation was named after.

The actual position isn't complicated. The Indus heritage belongs first to the Indus land and its people. Parts of it are shared across the northwest (eastern Punjab, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Haryana). Some practices were absorbed into Dharmic traditions. Some passed into Muslim, Sikh, Christian and secular life. History did what history always does: it moved people, changed faiths, carried customs across borders, and left older inheritances living under newer names.

The name changed but the people didn't vanish into thin air. Likewise, religion changed for many but the land didn't move somewhere else. No amount of Saraswati branding makes the Indus Valley a Gangetic possession.

rsv subramanian's avatar

Pakis have every right to give expression to their historical scizophrenia through such cultural thefts, ambiguities in thinking. Poor things most of them are descrnded from bastards sired by invading armies. They know not their ancestors and their enormous inheritance of values from more than 5000 years ago

They hug to the disease injected by the marauding bruits like an incurable itch.

It is time that they realise their predicament arose not by chooce but by beastly lust the invading bruits continue to display in various forms of Jihad.

The solution to darkness is light. The remedy for inherited disease is to recognise it as a disease first and then resort to cure.

There is neither a dignifying past or a promising future for those reduced to this split personality.

thresiya's avatar

What a stupid logic.

naseeruddin's avatar

Keeping aside indo-pak skirmish. Why Muslims can't embrace Hindus ancestary while keeping their Monotheistic belief? The problem with Hinduism is even they don't allow Dalits a proper spiritual place.

Gokul's avatar

Okay, on the same line, you cannot claim to be Aryan and claim IVC at the same time

Hamza Jahangir's avatar

You can trace back 10000 years but people of indus valley never had poop festival, never drunk cow piss and they never appreciated brahamanism. Punjab and the people of area always resisted brahmanism. Other than that, people of indus valley use to have toilets 5000 years ago, which pajeets don't have in 2026..

Rameshwar Ravi N's avatar

Good to know we are finally awake and fighting back.